Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Federal Reserve to Curb Mortgage Lending Abuses: More Rules for Those Who Hate Rules
The Federal Reserve proposed rules today to curb abusive lending practices. They think it may not be a good thing—you know, lenders giving loans to folks who can’t afford to repay them, which leads to foreclosures, which leads to bank losses, which leads to less lending, which leads to less buying, which leads to less selling, which leads to a weakening economy, which leads to less holiday gift spending, which leads to a recession. Oh, my!
Now, you would think the whole process could be avoided if buyers did not borrow over their heads. Then again, you would think mortgage brokers would advise clients not to borrow over their heads. Or maybe the fellows with the dough to lend would just not lend it to folks who want to borrow over their head. Surely, everyone wanted to reach the same goal, so the fault must be divied up—don’t mortgage something you can’t afford to lose, don’t get a client a loan just to make a commission, and don’t lend money against property you are likely to foreclose.
Anyhoot, here are the proposed rules, in a nutshell (they will not be made final until consumer comments are reviewed):
1. Do not give unaffordable loans. Instead of measuring a borrower’s ability to repay based on the lowball sub-prime ARM introductory rate, measure it against the reset rate. In other words, stop the sucker loans.
2. Restrict “stated income” or “no income verification loans. These “liar” loans lead to borrowers taking loans they never should have taken in the first place. These were great for lenders and mortgage brokers because it gave them an out– “It ain’t our fault, the guy said he made a million bucks. It’s not our obligation to check it out. Who thinks people will lie to get money?”
3. Eliminate or limit prepayment penalties. It does not take much to figure out that steep penalties for paying off a loan early would limit consumers’ refinancing options. Hmm… you don’t pay back the bank, they’re unhappy; you pay them back early, they’re still unhappy. You just can’t please some people.
4. Require disclosure of broker incentives. Wow. You mean borrowers would know just how much the mortgage broker was being paid? These brokers are gonna have a heck of time explaining yield spread premiums.
5. Prohibit coercion of appraisers. You mean appraisers allow themselves to be coerced? Maybe appraisers need to tell folks “Hey, I need my job so I’m giving the bank this appraisal number, but just between us, the appraisal I’d like to send them is this.”
6. Require better disclosure. Oh no. More forms that no one will read, drafted by lawyers who still think they should be charging by the word (some of them may even throw in some legalese, or latin, you know, to show they’re smarter and entitled to higher fees)
Maybe those armchair anarchists are right. Abolish government and all these silly laws. Let the consumer figure it out— or get what’s coming to them.
If it were up to us, there would be only one rule: Is this a loan you would give to your mother?
Source: CNN Money.
(CNNMoney) - Si has estado renuente a comprar una casa, 2016 es el año para dar el paso, al menos en el mercado estadounidense. Las ta...
Escuela ofrece el primer video de repaso por Internet para la porción nacional del examen de bienes raíces en los Estados Unidos Tape Ed Re...
REO en términos simples (Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) ¿Qué es una propiedad REO en resumidas cuentas? ¿En qué se diferencia del proceso de c...